Final answer:
The statement is false; organic shapes are irregular and found in nature, whereas geometric shapes are regular and even. Organic shapes are loose and curving compared to the structured geometric shapes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that organic shapes are regular and even is false. Organic shapes are found in nature and are characterized by their loose, curving, and irregular qualities. In contrast, geometric shapes are the ones that are regular and even, often containing straight or perfectly curved lines, like those found in geometry. In art, organic shapes flow naturally and are unpredictable, much like the lines in the manes and tails of horses or the ruffled clouds in a Dürer print, as mentioned in the reference material. Conversely, geometric shapes are structured, consistent, and can repeat in a pattern, such as the horizontal lines in the background of the same print.
Therefore, works of art can feature both types of shapes, but they have distinct characteristics that set them apart from one another. Organic shapes are more free-form and less bound by strict rules than geometric shapes. They also contribute to the illusion of three-dimensionality and form in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional art.