Question

Describe a speech with the following structure:

First Paragraph: Hook your audience into wanting to read or hear your speech. You can tell a story or use a quote. Introduce the event and basic facts like people and places. Use at least three to five sentences.
Second paragraph: Discuss the separation of powers and checks and balances. Use examples to explain the difference between the two ideas.
Third paragraph: Discuss the position of the Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.
Fourth paragraph: Discuss the position of the Anti-Federalists related to ratification of the Constitution. Use facts.

Answer 1

The speech structure should begin with an engaging first paragraph, discuss separation of powers and checks and balances in the second, detail the Federalists' stance on ratification in the third, the Anti-Federalists' position in the fourth, and conclude with a summary and significance of the arguments.

Step-by-step explanation:

When tasked with describing a speech detailing the federal form of government to your state's constituents, the structure should unfold in an organized manner. The first paragraph should employ a compelling hook, such as a pertinent quote or a brief narrative—a story that invites the audience to engage with the topic of the government's structure. This should include a basic introduction to the event with essential facts regarding key figures and locations, establishing the context for your audience.

In the second paragraph, the focus shifts to discussing the principles of the separation of powers and the system of checks and balances. Here, distinct examples should be used to delineate the two concepts, elucidating how they serve to maintain a balanced government where no single branch holds unchecked authority.

The third paragraph explores the perspectives of the Federalists in relation to the ratification of the Constitution. They supported a robust central government and their philosophy should be substantiated with factual information, detailing their motivations and reasoning for the ratification.

Conversely, the fourth paragraph delves into the stance of the Anti-Federalists. Emphasize their standpoint with facts, demonstrating their concerns over the Constitution granting excessive power to the national government and their preference for stronger state sovereignties.

In crafting the conclusion, restate your thesis in new terms to reinforce the message and summarize the main arguments. The final thoughts should address the significance of the analysis, helping the audience grasp the relevance of the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists to both historical context and contemporary discussions of government power.