Final answer:
bell hooks' perspective on marriage would align with a postmodern and critical view of social norms, emphasizing equality and the intersections of race, gender, and class within this institution. Her work suggests an advocacy for challenging traditional power structures and redefining marriage in the context of social justice movements.
Step-by-step explanation:
Where bell hooks and her perspective of marriage aligns best can be understood through her extensive work on issues of race, gender, and class. hooks takes a postmodern approach to societal structures, which implies that her view on marriage would likely be critical of conventional norms and attentive to the power dynamics within the institution. She has emphasized the importance of intersectionality in understanding oppression, suggesting that her perspective on marriage would also consider how race, class, and gender intersect within this context. These insights are relevant to today's discussions on marriage, including debates surrounding same-sex marriage and the evolving roles within American marriages, as indicated by the changing gender roles documented by researchers like Lucy A. Hawke.
Considering hooks' focus on the 'feminization of poverty' and her call for a grassroots radical feminist movement, it can be inferred that her perspective on marriage would advocate for equality and question traditional power structures. This aligns with the conflict theorists' views on marriage, as well as broader societal changes reflected in historical shifts such as the legalization of interracial marriages. hooks might approach the concept of marriage not as an unchangeable institution but as a dynamic social construct susceptible to redefinition and reinvention in the face of changing social norms and justice movements.