Final answer:
Defining majority opinion is complex and can lead to situations where a clear majority choice is not possible, as with families voting on a menu or similar candidates splitting votes in an election.
Step-by-step explanation:
Defining majority opinion can be complex, often stepping beyond clear-cut electoral boundaries. The concept to ascertain majority is employed in various contexts — from political scenarios to decisions made amongst individuals or groups. When we consider a hypothetical situation involving three families, like the Ortegas, Schmidts, and Alexanders, who must collectively decide on a New Year's Day menu, difficulties may arise. If each family votes for a different entree, achieving a classical 2-1 majority becomes impossible. Here, majority opinion does not emerge through simple arithmetic.
In another example, when numerous candidates from the same affiliation split the votes among similar-minded electorates, as with the 'Coca-Cola candidates', the will of the majority may not be reflected in the outcome, leaving those who prefer Pepsi with greater voting strength per individual. This scenario echoes the challenges presented when multiple voices within large group meetings attempt to influence a decision. Although not every voice will shape the policy, a diverse set of opinions ensures a more balanced resolution, ideally tailored to satisfy the majority.