Final answer:
Analysis of "The Idler" in terms of Romanticism or Realism involves examining its characterization, dialogue, plot development, and adherence to ordinary life versus emotional dramatization and idealized narratives.
Step-by-step explanation:
"The Idler" can be analyzed for aspects of Romanticism and Realism based on how the work adheres to or rejects the conventions of these literary movements. Romanticism tends to embrace emotionalism, idealism, and characters that deviate from normal life, often depicting these characters and settings with nostalgia and sentimentality. By contrast, Realism focuses on ordinary people, their plausible struggles, and settings that are true to life, without the embellishments of the Romantics. Details and accuracy are paramount in Realism, portraying characters and dialogue that align with their social class in a natural manner, and plots are often formed around the characters' realistic and unresolved conflicts.
When analyzing "The Idler," one might consider the depth and complexity of characterization, the dialogue's adherence to the speech patterns of the character's social class, and the extent to which the plot is driven by the exploration of a character's realistic struggle. Furthermore, if the work features ordinary settings and avoids sentimental or overly dramatic elements, it leans more towards Realism. On the other hand, if "The Idler" includes variations from normal life, indulges in emotionalism, or ends with neat resolutions, it might show ties to Romanticism.