Final answer:
Slave rebellions had the best chance of success in areas with significant free Black populations and close proximity to free states, as these conditions provided opportunities for escape and resistance. Maryland and Kentucky are notable examples where such conditions existed. Rebellions like the one near New Orleans were less likely to succeed due to heavy retaliation and less favorable conditions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question concerns the historical contexts in which rebellions by enslaved people were most likely to be successful. Considering the provided information, we can determine that the likelihood of a successful rebellion or escape for enslaved people varied greatly depending on geographical location and social conditions.
In the context of the antebellum South, slave rebellions did occur, such as the 1811 uprising near New Orleans led by Charles Deslondes. However, these rebellions often faced massive retaliation and had slim chances of enduring success. Geographical proximity to free states enhanced the likelihood of successful flight to freedom, as seen in the border states like Maryland and Kentucky, where significant free Black populations could help freedom seekers pass as free and use maritime and rail links to facilitate escape.
Enslaved resistance
was not strictly about bloody rebellion. Manumissions and political pressures during the Civil War also played roles in undermining slavery in specific areas, like in Maryland and Missouri. These factors, alongside the assistance from free Black populations, suggest that rebellions or escape attempts might have had comparatively better odds in these areas as opposed to the Deep South.
Given these perspectives, the most likely places where rebellions from enslaved people had potential for success were not firmly entrenched slaveholding areas like Georgia and Florida, but rather in areas with supportive populations and infrastructure that could aid in an escape to freedom.