Final answer:
The historical context of a son taking command in Judea refers to Vespasian and his son Titus after their conquest in 75 CE, which echoes a recurring historical theme of sons inheriting responsibilities from their fathers.
Step-by-step explanation:
The sentence "let his son take command in Judea" likely refers to the historical event where Vespasian and his son Titus conquered Judaea in 75 CE. This event marked a significant military success and led to substantial financial gains for the Roman Empire, funding constructions such as the Colosseum. The act of a son inheriting responsibilities, including military or civil command, is a common theme in history, echoed in other narratives such as Thutmose III taking control in Egypt after Hatshepsut's death and leading the military against various threats.
Such succession and inheritance were not just limited to command but also to property and debts, with the expectation to uphold the family's reputation and prosperity. Historical accounts often highlight this transition of power and responsibility from father to son, whether through designated inheritance or the rise to power in the aftermath of a predecessor's demise.