Final answer:
The animals' promised rewards were either delayed or not provided at all, creating a scenario of disappointment and scarcity, causing them to face the consequences of not receiving what was promised.
Step-by-step explanation:
The animals' promised rewards appear to have been delayed or taken away entirely. The excerpts suggest a situation where two groups were expected to receive rewards under certain conditions: Group II was not to be rewarded for the first six days, but would receive food afterward, and Group III was not to be rewarded for the first three days but would receive food thereafter. However, the other excerpts paint a picture of scarcity and deprivation, alluding to the fact that the promised compensation or rewards may never come, or if they do, it might be too late or insufficient. This is emphasized by the mention of arriving late and all the good stuff being gone, as well as the question of whether humans can resist consuming readily available resources. The narrative points to the idea that the anticipated benefits have either been postponed or are no longer attainable, much like the 'good stuff' that was no longer available.