Final answer:
The land requirements in Royal Georgia gave the most power to the malcontents through a system where land grants were tied to slave ownership, which did not democratize power among all colonists but rather favored those who could afford slaves and land.
Step-by-step explanation:
The result of the land requirements for elected officials in Royal Georgia was that it gave the most power to the malcontents who paid their way to Georgia. This happened because after the prohibition of slavery was lifted in Georgia, land grants were tied to slave ownership.
Hence, the more slaves someone had, the more land they could obtain, and therefore potentially the more influence and power. The requirements did not democratize power among all colonists but rather concentrated it among those who could afford to purchase slaves and land.
Groups such as the Salzburgers, who came to Georgia for religious reasons and managed to establish successful settlements, opposed the legalization of slavery on religious grounds.
However, despite their significance and success in the colony, they did not gain power through this model as their religious convictions led them to oppose slavery rather than use it to acquire more land.
Similarly, the social provisions of the Georgia Charter initially demonstrated some inclusion, for example, allowing a group of Jews to stay despite the Trustees' objections, but did not grant them any particular power in the land grant system which was becoming increasingly tied to slave ownership.