93.2k views
5 votes
Should the project team change the estimated impacts of previously identified risks as the project progresses?

A) Yes, to reflect evolving circumstances and knowledge.

B) No, the estimated impacts should remain static throughout the project.

C) Yes, only if the project is ahead of schedule.

D) No, unless there is a change in project leadership.

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The project team should change the estimated impacts of previously identified risks to reflect evolving circumstances and knowledge, as this is a crucial part of effective project risk management.

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is A) Yes, to reflect evolving circumstances and knowledge. As a project progresses, risks must be re-evaluated and their estimated impacts updated. This is because the context in which the project operates can change, including factors such as market conditions, technological advancements, or stakeholder expectations. For example, what might have been considered a low-impact risk at the beginning of a project could escalate to a high-impact risk due to unforeseen circumstances or additional information that emerges as the project unfolds.

Risk management is a dynamic process and needs regular review to ensure that risk responses are still relevant and effective. If a project is ahead of schedule or there is a change in leadership, these are just single factors among many that could influence risk perceptions and should not be the sole reasons for changing risk impact estimates.

Therefore, a project team must keep the assessment of risks up-to-date by continually identifying, analyzing, and planning for potential risks throughout the project life cycle. This ensures that the team is prepared to handle risks effectively and can maintain project integrity and success.

User Saalon
by
7.5k points