Final answer:
The FALSE statement about Kelly's constructive alternativism is that it proposes there is only one accurate and objective way to interpret events, contradicting the theory's emphasis on individual subjective interpretations of reality.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that is FALSE about Kelly's constructive alternativism is: Constructive alternativism proposes that there is only one accurate and objective way to interpret events. This statement is contrary to the central tenet of constructive alternativism, which emphasizes that reality is subjectively constructed by individuals through unique cognitive processes. There is not one objective interpretation of events; rather, individual interpretations can vary widely based on personal perspectives and experiences.
Within the context of constructivism, reality emerges from human cognitive constructions that are continually shaped and reshaped through social interactions. Norms and values within a society or culture develop from these shared understandings; however, they are not universally static and may change over time. For example, cultural practices on what to do when one finds a wallet demonstrate how different societies construct deviance in varying ways. What is deemed appropriate or deviant behavior can diverge significantly depending on cultural context.