Final answer:
The statement is false; Canadian law provides various dispute resolution methods, including negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and the court system, which may involve a judge or a jury deciding on the outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that in every type of business dispute resolution, Canadian law requires that a judge must decide the amount of the loss is false. In the Canadian legal system, there are various means by which a dispute can be resolved. These include negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and the traditional court system where a judge or a jury may be involved. During negotiations and mediation, the parties involved often work together to reach a mutual agreement, which may not necessarily involve a judge's decision. In arbitration, an arbitrator makes the decision, which is binding on both parties. In some cases, such as small claims court, a judge can make a decision alone, but in cases involving larger sums or more complex issues, a jury might decide on the awarding of damages, based on the applicable laws and presented evidence.
Accessible and impartial dispute resolution methods aim to provide justice in a timely manner and involve competent, ethical, and independent decision-makers. These methods are crucial to managing workplace conflicts efficiently, reducing stress, protecting morale, and avoiding loss of productivity. By resolving disputes through these diverse mechanisms, businesses have the opportunity to maintain relationships while addressing the conflict's nature and impact. Ultimately, the adversarial judicial system ensures that parties share evidence openly and that an impartial person or group such as a judge or jury determines the outcome, thus reflecting the principles of the rule of law.