198k views
5 votes
A historian would best use this document as______.

A) Evidence of the punitive nature of colonial laws in Maryland.
B) Evidence of intolerance of religious worship in colonial law.
C) Evidence of colonial support for the democratic principle of religious tolerance.
D) The existence of a unified religious community in colonial America.

User Favas Kv
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The document serves as evidence of colonial support for the democratic principle of religious tolerance, highlighting the Maryland Toleration Act of 1649, which extended religious freedom to all Christians and indicates a trend towards increased religious diversity in the American colonies.

Step-by-step explanation:

A historian analyzing the given document would find it to be evidence of colonial support for the democratic principle of religious tolerance. The Maryland Toleration Act of 1649 is highlighted as a significant legislation that provided religious freedom to all Christians, which was a progressive and liberal policy of that time. Although the Act did not extend to non-Christians and included punitive measures for those who denied the divine nature of Christ, its emphasis on Christian religious tolerance was a noteworthy development in the American colonies. It indicated a shift away from strict religious uniformity and towards a more democratic approach to religious beliefs within the constraints of the colonial era's social and political context.

Within the broader context of colonial America, other examples support the notion of growing religious diversity and tolerance, such as the colonies of Rhode Island and Pennsylvania, which espoused religious freedom and opposed the establishment of an official church. Despite conflicts like those seen in Puritan colonies, these examples demonstrate a trend towards religious diversity and self-governance, contributing to the background against which the document would be best understood.

User Yanjost
by
7.8k points