Final answer:
The monthly cost (C) of Option A can be represented by the equation C = 30 + R * 1, where R is the number of rides. The monthly cost (C) of Option B can be represented by the equation C = R * 2.50.
The total costs of both options will be the same after 20 rides, and Option B will be more cost-effective than Option A when the number of rides is less than 20.
Step-by-step explanation:
A) Monthly cost (C) of Option A based on the number of rides (R):
The monthly cost of Option A consists of the $30 monthly pass plus an additional $1 for each ride, regardless of the number of rides taken. Therefore, the equation for the monthly cost (C) of Option A based on the number of rides (R) is:
C = 30 + R * 1
B) Monthly cost (C) of Option B based on the number of rides (R):
The monthly cost of Option B is simply $2.50 for each ride that is taken. Therefore, the equation for the monthly cost (C) of Option B based on the number of rides (R) is:
C = R * 2.50
C) Number of rides at which the total costs of both options are the same:
To find the number of rides at which the total costs of both options are the same, we set the equations for Option A and Option B equal to each other:
30 + R * 1 = R * 2.50
Simplifying this equation, we get:
30 = R * 2.50 - R
30 = R * (2.50 - 1)
30 = R * 1.50
To solve for R, we divide both sides of the equation by 1.50:
R = 30 / 1.50
R = 20
Therefore, the total costs of both options will be the same after 20 rides.
D) Number of rides at which Option B is more cost-effective than Option A:
To find the number of rides at which Option B is more cost-effective than Option A, we need to compare the total costs of both options. We can calculate the total cost of Option A by substituting the number of rides (R) into the equation for Option A:
Total cost of Option A = 30 + 1 * R
We can calculate the total cost of Option B by substituting the number of rides (R) into the equation for Option B:
Total cost of Option B = 2.50 * R
Setting the total cost of Option B less than the total cost of Option A, we get:
2.50 * R < 30 + 1 * R
Simplifying this inequality, we get:
1.50 * R < 30
To find the minimum number of rides (R) that satisfies this inequality, we divide both sides of the inequality by 1.50:
R < 20
Therefore, Option B will be more cost-effective than Option A when the number of rides (R) is less than 20.