Final answer:
Nozick would distribute based on merit and ability, while Aristotle would distribute based on desert.
Step-by-step explanation:
Nozick and Aristotle would both argue for different approaches to how we should distribute high-quality violins. Nozick would likely argue for distributing the violins based on merit and ability. This means that those who have the most skill and talent in playing the violin would be the ones to receive the high-quality violins. Aristotle, on the other hand, would argue for distributing the violins based on the concept of desert. This means that those who have put in the most effort, practice, and dedication in learning and playing the violin would be the ones to receive the high-quality violins.