Final answer:
Roman Polanski's film adaptation of Macbeth differs from the print version by offering visual details and realistic settings, capturing the tone and mood, and allowing for some directorial interpretations. These elements highlight alterations in setting and themes while maintaining the essence of Shakespeare's work. Thus (option b) is right answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
When comparing Roman Polanski's 1971 film adaptation of Macbeth to the original play by William Shakespeare, it is important to note the differences and similarities in setting, characters' actions, and themes. One of the significant aspects of the film is that it can portray setting using actual locations and visual effects, which does not rely solely on the imagination of the audience, unlike a play's set. Furthermore, Polanski's Macbeth captures the grim tone and mood of the play, often employing a realistic interpretation of scenes.
Play adaptations often vary in their portrayal of characters and settings due to the director's vision and the limitations or possibilities of the medium. In case of the film, this includes the use of costumes, set designs, and delivery of lines which can either adhere closely to the original script or deviate for dramatic effect. While some details from the print version might be omitted or altered, others are expanded upon to enhance the cinematic experience.
Though the film is not shot chronologically, as is the nature of filmmaking, the actors and the director must have a clear vision of the entire narrative, which can sometimes intensify the portrayal of thematic elements like the ghosts representing oppression, similar to the print version's use of unreliable narrators and ghosts. This detailed interpretation aids in capturing the setting and themes of Shakespeare's original work, though it might not include every fidelity detail from the print version. Thus (option b) is right answer.