Final answer:
A negative consequence of international food aid is that it may undermine local farmers, leading to economic issues and forcing them out of jobs, with past examples including EU milk to Jamaica and US rice to Haiti. Social and environmental issues can also arise, such as displacement and rights violations seen in Tanzania's wheat production project.
Step-by-step explanation:
One negative consequence of international food aid is that it can harm local economies by undermining local farmers. When international aid in the form of food donations arrives, it can lead to an influx of cheap or free food, which may result in a decrease in the demand for locally produced food. This decrease in demand can make it difficult for local farmers to compete and may force them out of jobs. For example, shipments of excess milk from the European Union to Jamaica and excess rice from the United States to Haiti have significantly impacted local dairy and rice farmers, respectively, by driving them out of business.
In addition to economic effects, consequences can also include social and environmental impacts. The Canadian foreign aid organization (CIDA)'s provision of $100 million to Tanzania to grow wheat led to detrimental effects on human rights and livelihoods, with villagers being displaced and harmed because they refused to leave their land to make way for wheat production. These examples collectively demonstrate the complexities and potential downsides of international food aid on local communities.