Final answer:
The claim that power sharing makes quick decisions impossible is false; power sharing allows for more perspectives but does not prevent rapid consensus when needed. It is true that majority rule can fail to produce a clear outcome with multiple choices due to a voting cycle.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that power sharing makes it impossible to take quick decisions is false. While it is true that power sharing can sometimes complicate the decision-making process because it involves more stakeholders, it does not make quick decisions impossible. Instead, it ensures that multiple perspectives are considered, leading to more inclusive and often well-thought-out outcomes. Rapid decisions can still be made if there is consensus or in situations where quick action is necessary and protocols for such scenarios are in place. Regarding decision-making rules, it is true that majority rule can fail to produce a single preferred outcome when there are more than two choices. This situation is known as a voting cycle, or Condorcet paradox, where majority preferences cycle through the options without reaching a conclusive outcome. For example, if a group prefers option A to B, B to C, and then C to A, they will not be able to determine a majority winner among the three choices.