Final answer:
The details provided discuss the impact of Supreme Court rulings but do not specifically address how a 1987 decision changed extradition policy. Instead, examples such as Korematsu v. United States and Arizona v. United States illustrate the evolving nature of Supreme Court decisions over time.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question posed is related to how a 1987 Supreme Court decision changed the policy of extradition, but the information provided does not directly answer this question. The details given encompass various Supreme Court decisions that have shaped law and policy in areas such as the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II, immigration laws, and counterterrorism measures. All these instances show the evolution and impact of Supreme Court rulings over time, from Korematsu v. United States to Arizona v. United States regarding immigration. The Supreme Court's decisions are significant in that they can redefine legal precedents and governmental powers as societal norms and constitutional interpretations change.