Question

CLAIM: Empty warehouses in cities should be sold cheaply to artists tocreate spaces for neighborhoods to redevelop.

COUNTERCLAIM: It's not nice to residents to sell or give away real
estate in a neighborhood.
Which is the best revision to the counterclaim?
Select one:
O Local neighbors many not want artists to profit from the donated warehouses because the money they make could be spent inappropriately.
O Local residents should be given the first opportunity to take over abandoned properties
o Giving away real estate may temporarily devalue neighboring properties, causing
value to fall for neighboring residents
O The neighborhood may already experience blight from the unoccupied warehouses.

Answer 1

The best revision to the counterclaim is that giving away real estate could devalue neighboring properties. Consideration of how warehouse redevelopment for artist spaces can lead to gentrification and the displacement of current residents is crucial.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best revision to the counterclaim regarding the sale of empty warehouses to artists for neighborhood redevelopment is: 'Giving away real estate may temporarily devalue neighboring properties, causing value to fall for neighboring residents.' This takes into account the potential impact on property values and the interests of the current residents. While artists moving into warehouses can help to revitalize a neighborhood, it's important to consider that such changes can also lead to gentrification, which might result in displacement of existing residents and businesses due to increased rents and changes to the neighborhood character. Efforts to profit from gentrification need to balance economic development with the need for community stability and preservation.