Final answer:
The use of sources from reputable academic journals, alignment with historical facts, and inclusion of diverse perspectives contribute to the credibility of a supporter's position on an amendment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The use of particular sources by the supporter of the amendment makes the supporter's position credible for several reasons. When sources are from reputable academic journals, they have undergone rigorous peer review and are written by experts in the field, thereby enhancing the credibility of the position being argued. Additionally, sources that align with historical facts provide evidence that is difficult to dispute, thus bolstering the argument's reliability. Diverse perspectives in the sources ensure a well-rounded understanding of the issue and demonstrate to the audience that the supporter has considered multiple viewpoints, adding to the argument's overall credibility.
Sources from credible websites, professional articles, and books can be particularly useful when discussing current events or discoveries that have yet to be reviewed in academic circles. These sources can offer broad perspectives that are accessible to a wider audience. However, evaluating the credibility of these sources is crucial, including checking the authors' academic affiliations and the context in which the information was originally presented. Following these guidelines helps establish trustworthiness and fairness in the approach to the issue.