Question

What is the BEST piece of evidence to prove the age of the Page-Ladson site?

a. In 1997, researchers found an archaeological site in Chile with evidence of human activity dating back to 14,500 years ago.

b. In 2002, 14,300-year-old fossils of human feces were found in Oregon.

c. The excavations at Page/Ladson are not new; in the 1980s and 90s, another research team determined that the site was more than 14,000 years old.

d. To prove the age of the site, clear evidence of human activity, usually in the form of stone tools, must be found in a solid place and dated using a reliable dating method.

Answer 1

The best evidence for the Page-Ladson site's age is the discovery of clear evidence of human activity, like stone tools, at the site that can be reliably dated.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best piece of evidence to prove the age of the Page-Ladson site would be d. To prove the age of the site, clear evidence of human activity, usually in the form of stone tools, must be found in a solid place and dated using a reliable dating method. This is because definitive proof of the site's age requires concrete archaeological evidence that can be accurately dated. Options a and b reference other sites and discoveries that do not directly establish the age of the Page-Ladson site, and option c refers to earlier research that would still require concrete artifacts and dating to substantiate the site's antiquity. The Page-Ladson site, with its own historical artifacts and contextual evidence, must be independently dated to validate its age.