Final answer:
Susan B. Anthony's argument after her conviction for voting ties into the strategies and challenges of the women's suffrage movement, including efforts to pass a constitutional amendment, campaigns at the state level, and obstacles like the Supreme Court rulings. Notable figures such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Sojourner Truth raised influential arguments against societal gender norms, contributing to the progression toward women's national suffrage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Susan B. Anthony's argument after being convicted of voting centers on the broader context of the women's suffrage movement and its strategies during the 1870s and 1880s. Women's rights advocates, including Anthony, utilized a range of strategies from attempting to register to vote to forming organizations like the National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) and the American Woman Suffrage Association (AWSA). These organizations advocated for women's right to vote through different approaches such as constitutional amendments and state-level campaigns. However, they faced significant obstacles, including Supreme Court decisions like Minor v. Happersett that upheld the idea of suffrage as a privilege, not a guaranteed right for all citizens. The arguments raised by suffragists during this period often intersected with issues of race and reflections on womanhood's domestic sphere.
Prominent suffragists like Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Sojourner Truth brought forth arguments that challenged the prevailing gender norms and highlighted the contradictions in denying women the right to vote. The women's rights movement was complex and sometimes fragmented, with various groups advocating different pathways to achieve suffrage. Nevertheless, the persistent advocacy led to some states granting women the right to vote by the late nineteenth century, setting the stage for the eventual win of national suffrage in 1920 with the ratification of the 19th Amendment.