Final answer:
The cases State of Ohio v. Holmes and Tennessee v. Garner address the use of deadly force by law enforcement and resulted in different outcomes and standards.
Step-by-step explanation:
The cases State of Ohio v. Holmes and Tennessee v. Garner are two separate legal cases that involve the use of deadly force by law enforcement. In State of Ohio v. Holmes, the court ruled that a police officer's use of deadly force was justified when they perceived a threat to their life or the life of another person. On the other hand, in Tennessee v. Garner, the court established a standard that prohibits the use of deadly force when it is used to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect who poses no immediate threat. Both cases address the use of deadly force by law enforcement but have different outcomes and standards based on the circumstances.