Final answer:
Between 1957-1960, the Southern revolution faced options including mass nonviolent protests, legal challenges, formation of civil rights organizations, and armed resistance. Mass nonviolent protests brought attention to the issue and pressured for change, while legal challenges resulted in landmark decisions. Civil rights organizations provided a unified voice but faced internal conflicts, and armed resistance risked further violence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Southern revolution in the years 1957-1960 faced several options in its fight for civil rights:
a. Mass nonviolent protests for civil rights: This option involved organizing peaceful demonstrations and boycotts to raise awareness about discriminatory practices and demand equality. The gain of this choice was that it drew attention to the issue and put pressure on the government and society to enact change. The loss was that it often faced violent opposition from those who resisted desegregation.
b. Legal challenges to segregation laws: This option involved using the court system to challenge and overturn discriminatory laws. The gain of this choice was that it resulted in landmark decisions like the Brown v. Board of Education case, which declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. The loss was that it was a slow and costly process, and progress was often met with resistance.
c. Formation of civil rights organizations: This option involved creating organizations like the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) to coordinate and mobilize the civil rights movement. The gain of this choice was that it provided a unified voice for the movement and allowed for more effective organizing. The loss was that it faced internal conflicts and challenges to its leadership.
d. Armed resistance against discriminatory practices: This option involved using violence as a means of fighting against discriminatory practices. The gain of this choice was that it could be seen as a form of self-defense and resistance against oppression. The loss was that it risked further violence and played into the narrative of the movement's opponents.