Final answer:
The statement regarding the Star Model being a model for knowledge transformation in EBP is false; it is a framework for translating research into practice. The claim that theories become laws over time is also false as they serve different purposes in science.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement about the Star Model of Knowledge Transformation is false. The Star Model is actually a framework developed by Kathleen Stevens for evidence-based practice (EBP) that aids in translating research into practice. It does address cycles, nature, and characteristics of knowledge within the context of EBP, but the main focus of the Star Model is on providing a systematic approach to translate evidence into practice. The model includes five stages: 1) Discovery, 2) Summary, 3) Translation to guidelines, 4) Integration into practice, and 5) Evaluation. This model is used extensively in health sciences, especially nursing, to improve healthcare outcomes by integrating the best research evidence into clinical practice.
Additionally, the statement 'When a theory has been known for a long time, it becomes a law' is also false. Theories and laws in science serve different purposes. A scientific law describes an observed phenomenon, while a scientific theory explains why a phenomenon occurs or how things work. Theories do not become laws over time; both are valuable and continue to coexist in scientific discourse.