Question

In which model of judicial decision making do the personal ideologies and policy preferences of the judges influence outcomes?

Option 1: legal model
Option 2: attitudinal model
Option 3: strategic model
Option 4: enumerated model

Answer 1

The attitudinal model is the approach to judicial decision-making where judges' personal beliefs and ideologies are the key factors influencing the outcomes of court cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

The attitudinal model of judicial decision-making is where personal ideologies and policy preferences of judges influence outcomes. This model suggests that justices and judges make decisions based on their personal values, political attitudes, and broad judicial philosophies such as judicial activism or restraint. As each judge's perspective varies, this can lead to a diverse range of rulings across different court systems, subject to the judges' individual interpretation of the law.