223k views
3 votes
Even if variables are correlated, explain how a change in one variable might not be caused by a change in another variable.

Select one:
a. Due to coincidences
b. Through reverse causation
c. Because of a third variable
d. Always caused by the same factor

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Even if variables are correlated, a third variable might explain the observed changes without there being a direct cause-and-effect relationship between the two originally considered variables, which demonstrates that correlation does not necessarily indicate causation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Even if variables are correlated, a change in one variable might not be caused by a change in another variable because of a third variable. The correct answer is c. Because of a third variable. To illustrate, imagine that ice cream sales and the rate of burglaries increase simultaneously. This does not necessarily mean that one causes the other; it is more plausible that they both increase due to a third factor such as warmer weather. This common third factor, known as a confounding variable, can explain why the two variables are moving together without having a direct causal relationship. Hence, correlation does not imply causation, and careful analysis must be undertaken to determine if there is a true cause-and-effect relationship.

User Adam Milward
by
8.9k points

Related questions

asked Jul 18, 2021 93.8k views
Mark Struzinski asked Jul 18, 2021
by Mark Struzinski
8.1k points
1 answer
0 votes
93.8k views
2 answers
5 votes
154k views