Final answer:
None of the OT Code of Ethics principles are considered less important in the professional sense; however, the principle of justice might be more emphasized when addressing disparities as it pertains to equitable service provision.
Step-by-step explanation:
When addressing disparity in the field of Occupational Therapy, none of the OT Code of Ethics principles are considered 'less important' in the professional sense. All principles hold significant value in guiding ethical conduct. However, for the purpose of addressing disparity, the principle of justice might take precedence because it directly involves providing fair and equitable services to all individuals. Autonomy respects the right of the client to make their own decisions. Nonmaleficence involves do no harm to clients, while beneficence involves contributing to the good health and welfare of clients. But when specifically targeting disparity, which often refers to unequal treatment or services among different populations, the justice principle is particularly relevant since it emphasizes equality and fairness in the provision of occupational therapy services. It is important to clarify that this does not diminish the importance of the other ethical principles, as they are all integral components of ethical practice. Occupational therapists must still respect a client's autonomy, ensure they do no harm, and work towards the benefit of all clients, but in the realm of addressing disparities, their actions may highlight the principle of justice more prominently.