188k views
5 votes
A scientific theory is a much more reliable description of how the physical world works, as it has been tested many times and been found to be true, whereas a hypothesis may not have been tested at all?

User Aviad
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

A scientific theory is a well-supported and repeatedly tested explanation of natural phenomena, whereas a hypothesis is an initial, tentative explanation that requires further testing and evidence to reach the status of a theory.

Step-by-step explanation:

Scientific Hypothesis vs. Scientific Theory

A scientific theory is a comprehensive explanation of an aspect of nature that has been repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation. Theories are widely accepted by the scientific community as a reliable account of natural phenomena, built upon a solid foundation of evidence. Scientific theories are not mere speculations; they must endure rigorous scrutiny and must be able to reliably predict future occurrences.

In contrast, a hypothesis is a tentatively proposed explanation for an observation, which serves as a starting point for further investigation. While a hypothesis may explain a phenomenon, it requires experimental evidence and verification to evolve into a theory. Often hypotheses are derived as potential explanations for patterns that are summarized in scientific laws.

In the progression of scientific understanding, the journey from hypothesis to theory is a path that requires the accumulation of substantial evidence. Initially, a hypothesis is a guided guess based on existing knowledge. After repeated testing and confirmation through experiments by multiple researchers, a hypothesis may become a scientific theory, indicating that it has withstood rigorous evaluation and has a significant amount of evidence supporting it.

User Mateva
by
7.6k points