Final answer:
The letter likely expresses opposition to placing TV cameras in the Supreme Court, aligning with the Court's traditional practice of not being filmed during oral arguments.
Step-by-step explanation:
The letter to the editor criticizes the idea of placing TV cameras in the Supreme Court. The primary point of view expressed in the letter is most likely b. Opposition to TV cameras in the Supreme Court. This stance is based on the tradition of the Supreme Court to conduct its oral arguments without being filmed or photographed, maintaining a certain level of privacy and decorum that many believe is essential to the court's operation. This tradition supports the Court's desire for impartiality and insulation from immediate public opinion and potential media influence.