Final answer:
The question invites a discussion about errors and the human response to them, influenced by psychology, within a literary context.
Step-by-step explanation:
This question pertains to the acknowledgement and retrospective analysis of errors and mistakes, topics well-discussed in the realms of psychology and self-improvement, and often reflected in literature. The snippets provided suggest a context of missed opportunities and the importance of timing ('All the good stuff was gone'), the impact of oversight in professional scenarios ('a clear case of somebody having blundered'), and the reflection on past mistakes in creative processes, such as in a production ('a mistake you made and that you were able to turn around'). The mention of the book by Tavris and Aronson further underscores the concept of cognitive dissonance and the human tendency to justify flawed actions.