Final Answer:
On social issues between T. Roosevelt and Wilson, one key difference was their approach to government intervention. Roosevelt, a Progressive, advocated for a more active role, using regulatory measures to address social problems. Wilson, while also a Progressive, believed in a more limited government role, emphasizing the need for competition and individual responsibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, both Progressive Presidents, had nuanced differences in their approaches to social issues. Roosevelt, often associated with the Progressive Party, embraced a more interventionist role for the government. He believed that the government should play an active role in regulating and addressing social issues. Roosevelt's agenda included trust-busting, consumer protection, and labor reforms, reflecting a belief in the government's responsibility to curb the excesses of powerful corporations and protect the rights of workers and consumers.
On the other hand, Woodrow Wilson, also a Progressive but with a different emphasis, favored a more restrained government role. Wilson believed in fostering competition and sought to break up monopolies through anti-trust measures like the Clayton Antitrust Act. While he supported some progressive reforms, Wilson generally leaned toward a more limited government involvement in the economy. Wilson's vision included the idea that a competitive market would naturally regulate itself, aligning with a philosophy of individual responsibility and free enterprise.
In summary, the difference in their views on government intervention is a key distinction in the social issues approach between Roosevelt and Wilson. While both were Progressives and shared common goals, their strategies for achieving social reform reflected varying degrees of governmental involvement in addressing societal challenges.