Final answer:
The most significant objection to the rule of James II centered on his efforts to establish a Catholic absolute monarchy, which threatened English civil liberties and religious freedom.
Step-by-step explanation:
The most significant objection to the rule of James II was that he was trying to establish a Catholic absolute monarchy and impose absolutism in England. James II's actions included putting aside the limitations on Catholics by appointing them to high positions, suspending laws, and even dissolving Parliament in 1687. The fear that England would follow the model of his cousin, the French Catholic King Louis XIV, led to concerns that James would use his power to oppress the English people and undermine their civil liberties and religious freedom.
The primary objection to the rule of James II stemmed from his perceived attempts to establish a Catholic absolute monarchy, imposing absolutism in England. James II's controversial actions involved circumventing limitations on Catholics by appointing them to prominent positions, suspending laws, and dissolving Parliament in 1687. The fear resonated that James, influenced by his cousin Louis XIV's absolutist rule in France, aimed to wield unchecked power to the detriment of English civil liberties and religious freedom. Concerns intensified that James would oppress the English people, favoring Catholic interests over broader religious and political freedoms. This apprehension ultimately fueled opposition, contributing significantly to the political climate that culminated in the Glorious Revolution of 1688, resulting in James II's ousting and the establishment of constitutional reforms limiting the power of the monarchy.