43.4k views
2 votes
John Mark Karr, an elementary school teacher, was arrested on August 15, 2006 in Bangkok, Thailand after he falsely confessed to the murder of JonBenet. He claimed that he drugged, sexually assaulted, and accidentally killed her. There was no evidence linking to him at the crime scene. During confession, Karr have basic facts that were publicly known and failed to provide convincing details. His claimed that he had drugged JonBenet was doubted because the autopsy indicated that no drugs were in her body. DNA samples that were taken from Karr didn't match DNA found on JonBenet's body?

User Swoot
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The subject of this question is law, specifically the case of John Mark Karr and the murder of JonBenet Ramsey. Karr falsely confessed to the murder, but there was no evidence linking him to the crime scene and DNA samples did not match the DNA found on JonBenet's body.

Step-by-step explanation:

The subject of this question is Law. The question pertains to the case of John Mark Karr, who falsely confessed to the murder of JonBenet Ramsey in 2006. Despite Karr's confession, there was no evidence linking him to the crime scene, and DNA samples taken from Karr did not match the DNA found on JonBenet's body. These factors cast doubt on Karr's claims and eventually led to his release.

User Adrian Coman
by
7.6k points