Final answer:
In reports and peer reviews, slang should typically be replaced with clear, direct, and conventional language, especially if the report follows academic standards such as MLA or APA. Reviewers should offer suggestions for changes while considering the report's context and audience. Careful attention to mechanics, grammar, and use of specialized vocabulary is essential.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you encounter slang words in your report or in a report you are peer-reviewing, it is crucial to use your discretion based on the context and audience of the report. In academic and professional settings, language should be clear, direct, and adhere to the standards of writing like MLA or APA style. When engaging in a peer review, consider the intention behind the slang: Does it enhance the understanding of a particular cultural context, or does it obscure meaning for a general audience?
If the slang terms do not align with the formal tone typically required in academic reports, suggesting a more conventional or precise alternative would be appropriate. During peer review, pay close attention to details of meaning, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Provide evidence-based feedback, changing spelling and punctuation as necessary, and explain why you've suggested changes. Finally, ensure that specialized terminology is accurately used when discussing specific disciplines.