Final answer:
Arguments against having initiative and recall include the burden on voters to be well-informed and engaged, and the potential for these forms of direct democracy to be influenced by wealthy individuals and businesses.
Step-by-step explanation:
Arguments for not having initiative and recall in some states focus on the challenges and potential drawbacks associated with these forms of direct democracy. One argument is that initiatives and recalls demand a considerable amount of voter information and engagement, which can be burdensome considering the complexity and number of issues on ballots. Many citizens do not have the time to thoroughly research each measure before voting. This can result in uninformed voting or voters skipping over initiatives and recalls altogether. Furthermore, there is an argument that direct democracy can be influenced by the wealthy and businesses, who use their resources to push their policies, thus undermining the supposed egalitarian nature of the process. A well-known example is the recall of California Governor Gray Davis in 2003 that was heavily influenced by significant donations from a wealthy individual.