Final answer:
The post-war of 1812 surge in nationalism influenced the United States to adopt economic policies such as the founding of the Second Bank and a protective tariff, as well as judicial policies through significant Supreme Court rulings that expanded federal power in economic matters.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Impact of Nationalism on Economic and Judicial Policies
After the War of 1812, there was a heightened sense of nationalism in the United States, which strongly influenced the country's economic and judicial policies. The fervor of nationalism fostered the Era of Good Feelings, marked by the intention to strengthen a self-sufficient nation. Economic measures, such as the chartering of the Second Bank of the United States and the implementation of a protective tariff, emerged. The establishment of the bank stabilized the currency and credit, while the tariff aimed to shield domestic manufacturing from overseas competition, thereby increasing self-reliance. On the judicial front, the Supreme Court made landmark decisions, including Dartmouth College v. Woodward, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Gibbons v. Ogden, which all served to augment the power of the federal government supporting economic growth. These decisions advocated for an expansive view of federal authority, enhancing its involvement in economic matters. Furthermore, American foreign policy under James Monroe and John Quincy Adams reflected nationalist aspirations, culminating in the Monroe Doctrine, which sought to protect American interests in the Western Hemisphere.
The new spirit of nationalism united the country in some respects but also laid the groundwork for future sectional divides. It encouraged federal involvement in the nation's economy, leading to significant changes in economic practices and policies. At the same time, this movement influenced judicial policies, as the Supreme Court rulings established precedents that backed broader federal economic intervention.