The facts of the case in People vs Nillosquin is that the court examined whether the exclusionary rule applied in cases where the police intentionally violated a defendant's Miranda rights.
What were the facts?
The facts of this case were an examination of the exclusionary rule, which prevents the admission of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Miranda's rights pointed to the right of an individual to remain silent as whatever they said could be used against them in a court of law. In this case, the court held that Miranda rights are upheld in situations where the police exploit a defendant's ignorance of their rights.
So, the exclusionary rule does not just apply when the police get evidence through force but also applies when ignorance is exploited.