Final answer:
Critics of corporate power in the U.S. generally argue that corporations hold too much sway over public interests, politics, and policy, leading to an imbalance that undermines democratic processes and exacerbates inequality.
Step-by-step explanation:
U.S. critics of corporate power generally hold that there is an imbalance favoring corporations over the public interest. They argue that the influence of money and financial resources gives undue power to large corporate entities, thereby compromising the democratic process and leading to potential oligarchy. This criticism extends to the media industry, globalization, and political campaign contributions. Critics worry that the corporate pursuit of profit can sometimes overshadow in-depth coverage of public affairs and lead to a narrow representation of different policy perspectives. Additionally, the shifting of manufacturing jobs to countries with lower labor costs and fewer environmental regulations is seen as another aspect of corporate power impacting domestic employment and exacerbating inequality. Furthermore, the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission is seen by many as exacerbating corporate influence in the political process.