Final answer:
Stakeholders in mining operations extend to local communities, NGOs, and the general public affected by environmental changes. There are ethical implications regarding environmental damage and cultural significance to the land. Corporate responsibility must encompass social, economic, and environmental aspects with proactive and inclusive practices.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the decision-making process of a mining operation, stakeholders beyond the miners, their families, investors, and the Peruvian government include the local community, indigenous populations, environmental activists, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the wider public who may be affected by environmental changes. Ethical implications arise when decisions made by mining corporations lead to environmental damage that affects local peoples and their livelihoods. When engaging in such projects, it is crucial for companies to consider the impact on land and water quality, as well as the cultural and spiritual significance of the land to indigenous communities, as seen in the case of protest against the mining operation at Cerro Quilish in Peru.
Corporate responsibility extends to social, economic, and environmental aspects, and should include efforts to mitigate negative consequences of mining activities, such as taking proactive measures to prevent health problems like lead poisoning, rather than providing technical fixes after the fact. It is also essential to involve local stakeholders at all stages, ensuring their views are represented and considered, as their lack of knowledge or investment can lead to inadequate feedback and unaddressed issues, evident in the case of the substance abuse prevention program.