Final answer:
The comparison between Ginnett’s Team Leadership Model and team performance components considers factors such as leadership, group dynamics, and the goals influencing team actions. Both sources underscore the importance of leadership style and group size in affecting team operations. Additionally, evaluating political groups like the MeToo and Tea Party movements involves assessing differences in leadership, membership, and activities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks for a comparison between Ginnett’s Team Leadership Model and the components of team performance as described in a specific textbook chapter. Ginnett's model focuses on various aspects of team leadership, including the role of the leader, the team's mission, the context in which the team operates, and the elements that fall within the internal and external environments of the team. On the other hand, team performance components generally include factors such as group dynamics, leadership styles, the impact of conformity, leadership, membership, and activities within groups, as well as the influence of a group’s goals on its participants. Both Ginnett's model and the textbook components recognize the importance of effective leadership and the interplay between group members in accomplishing the team's objectives.
Different styles of leadership and how size influences group dynamics are essential considerations in both sources. They examine how leadership style can affect team performance and how large or small groups operate differently. The question regarding conformity within groups pertains to the concept that group members often align their behaviors and attitudes to fit the group norms, which can significantly impact team functioning.
Finally, comparing and contrasting political groups, such as the MeToo and Tea Party movements, requires an analysis of leadership structure, group cohesion, and the external perception of each group. For instance, a group's goals, whether focused on social change or political advocacy, directly affect participant motivation and the delineation between in-groups and out-groups. Such an analysis would include the examination of group objectives and how they shape group identity and actions.