Final answer:
Unions have a complex relationship with technology, sometimes opposing it to protect jobs, but other times embracing it if they feel their skilled jobs are secure and productivity will increase. Union workers may trust their union to leverage negotiation in their favor when it comes to job security with new technology, while non-union workers may feel more at risk. The adaptability of union workers to technology varies and cannot be generalized.
Step-by-step explanation:
The implications of new technology for organized labor are multi-faceted and profoundly impactful. Unions often face the dilemma of embracing or opposing new technology. On one hand, technology can lead to job loss, and thus unions may oppose it. On the other hand, when higher-skilled union workers feel protected by their unions, they may support the introduction of new technology due to the prospects of increased productivity and the belief that their jobs are secure.
Moreover, union workers might be receptive to technology because they trust their unions to negotiate protection for their jobs and wages. This contrasts with non-union workers who may harbor more anxiety about being replaced by machines. Additionally, union workers generally have more experience and higher levels of training, which can make them less vulnerable and more adaptable to changes brought about by new technology.
Overall, it's challenging to categorically state whether union workers are uniformly more or less open to new technology as compared to their nonunion counterparts; much depends on the specific context and the manner in which labor unions negotiate the advent of technology.