Final answer:
The assertion that the final written warning is a mandatory step in a three-step progressive discipline process is false. While it is an important step, none are inherently mandatory; what's critical is clear communication and proper documentation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The accuracy of the statement that in an employer's progressive discipline process with only three steps the one step that should not be eliminated is the final written warning can be considered false. Although a final written warning is indeed essential, it's not mandatory per se. A progressive discipline process typically includes several steps, which may comprise an initial verbal warning, a written warning, and finally, termination of employment. The main purpose of the progression is to give an employee a chance to correct their behaviors before reaching the final step.
The most crucial aspect of a progressive discipline process, whichever steps it includes, is clear communication and documentation of each step. Employers must ensure that the employee understands the consequences of their actions and has an opportunity to improve. While some might argue that the final written warning is a significant and necessary step for legal reasons, as it serves as proof that the employer provided clear warning to the employee, in reality, none of the steps are essentially mandatory and it depends on the policy of the particular company.