Final answer:
Lona was treated unfairly during her interview process at ABC Business Ltd. Her qualifications were disregarded, and she faced discriminatory treatment that was not imposed on male candidates. As HR manager, it's critical to address this bias to align with fair hiring practices and legal standards.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the content of the report, I believe Lona was handled unfairly. Lona presented a solid background with seven years of experience in the field, yet she was subjected to a driving test, unlike her male counterparts. The questions raised by Lucky regarding her ability to fit into the workplace culture and his remarks about her gender are inappropriate and suggest a bias that could be construed as discriminatory.
In the historical context of women entering the workforce, we've seen precedence for hiring without gender bias when there is a rational need for the job to be done and the candidate is capable. The assembly line case and the example of a woman hired as a 'conductorette' illustrate that competency should take precedence over gender. In Lona's case, her treatment constituted a disregard for her proven abilities and her discrimination based on gender, which violates fair hiring practices.
The bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) defense and court guidelines make it clear that unless a specific gender is essential to the job, which does not appear to be the case at ABC Business Ltd, discrimination based on gender is not permissible. It is imperative for an HR manager to ensure fair hiring practices and to address any gender bias evident in the recruitment process.