Final answer:
A review of a business article on consulting engagement or client processes involves a critical analysis and summary of the content, paying attention to the article's structure, use of evidence, and transitions, guided by APA standards.
Step-by-step explanation:
When conducting a review of an article exploring the consulting engagement process, the client change process, or the client operational process, it is not enough to merely copy-paste the information. Instead, one must analyze the content critically and summarize the findings in their own words. The review should consist of an introduction that presents the article, a summary that briefly encapsulates the main points, an analysis that delves into the article's content, and a conclusion that reflects on the overall significance and implications of the work.
A well-crafted article review will also pay attention to specific aspects such as clear exposition of the problem, use of statistics as evidence, skillful use of transitions to connect ideas, and a comprehensive summary that helps readers to quickly grasp the main arguments and their relevance to the field. APA documentation style will guide the citations and references, ensuring academic integrity and giving credit to original sources.
The reviewing process involves meticulously studying the article's structure, often starting with the table of contents or scanning headings, and reading the introduction and conclusion to understand the article's argument. Including a table of contents, abstract or executive summary, and a list of figures or tables are also important elements of a formal analytical report, and the APA guidelines provided by authoritative sources like the Purdue University Online Writing Lab can be instrumental in this endeavor.