197k views
3 votes
There is a wide variety and scope in the definition of health care quality.

Why do you think this is? Does this impact a Health Care Administrator’s ability to manage quality? Why or why not?

User Cullub
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The definition of health care quality varies due to its multidimensional nature and stakeholder priorities. Health Care Administrators face challenges in managing quality by balancing quality, cost, and access. The PPACA and comparisons with WHO goals highlight the need for improved health systems.

Step-by-step explanation:

The variety and scope in the definition of health care quality can be attributed to the multidimensional aspects of health care, which include patient safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. The variability in definitions reflects the different priorities and needs of stakeholders, such as patients, providers, and payers in the health care system. It is evident that in the United States, a largely private health insurance and healthcare delivery system provides high quality of care and innovations, yet struggles with cost control and universal access. This complexity undeniably affects a Health Care Administrator's ability to manage quality, as they must balance these multiple factors to ensure the provision of high-quality care while addressing cost and access concerns.

Managing the quality of health care requires a multifaceted approach. Health Care Administrators must navigate policies that balance treatment costs, diagnosis expenses, patient quality of life, and risks to individual privacy. The PPACA (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act), although controversial, addresses some of these concerns by aiming to improve access to care and reduce costs. A comparative analysis of the U.S. healthcare system with the WHO's Millennium Development Goals reveals disparities and suggests the need for a system that can achieve a balance between quality, access, and cost to improve health outcomes.

User Ni Xiaoni
by
8.3k points