Question

Debates have occurred for years about micromanagement and the impact to productivity and organizational culture. Within 500-750 words, discuss and explain if it is better to micromanagement or undermanagement? What's the difference? Which has a greater impact, positive or negative and why?

Answer 1

Micromanagement is a management style where a manager closely monitors and controls every aspect of their employees' work. Undermanagement, on the other hand, is a management style where a manager provides little to no guidance or direction to their employees. Both micromanagement and undermanagement can have a negative impact on productivity and organizational culture, but micromanagement tends to have more detrimental effects.

Step-by-step explanation:

Micromanagement vs. Undermanagement:

Micromanagement is a management style where a manager closely monitors and controls every aspect of their employees' work. Undermanagement, on the other hand, is a management style where a manager provides little to no guidance or direction to their employees.

The impact of micromanagement and undermanagement:

Micromanagement can have a negative impact on productivity and organizational culture. It can lead to decreased employee morale, increased stress, and hinder creativity and innovation. On the other hand, undermanagement can also have negative consequences, such as missed deadlines, lack of accountability, and poor performance.

Which has a greater impact, positive or negative?

Both micromanagement and undermanagement can have a negative impact on productivity and organizational culture. However, when it comes to the greater negative impact, micromanagement tends to have more detrimental effects. Micromanagement can create a sense of mistrust and demotivation among employees, resulting in decreased productivity and employee turnover.