128k views
4 votes
While Aereo initially did not want to be classified as a cable TV company, it eventually tried to use this provision of the Copyright Act of 1976 to save its business.

a. The Fortnightly exemption.

b. The Section 111 Compulsory Licensing Requirement.

c. The Section 706 Advanced Services Requirement.

d. The Title 17 Food and Drinking Establishment Exemption.

User Yudy
by
7.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Aero initially sidestepped being classified as a cable TV company but later attempted to use the Section 111 Compulsory Licensing Requirement of the Copyright Act to address legal challenges and continue its operations.

Step-by-step explanation:

Aero initially did not want to be classified as a cable TV company, but as it sought to save its business model, it eventually strived to align with a provision of the Copyright Act of 1976. This was an attempt to mitigate legal challenges it faced regarding the broadcasting of television programs over the internet without paying broadcasters for the content. Specifically, Aereo turned to b. The Section 111 Compulsory Licensing Requirement, which allows cable TV companies to retransmit broadcast content by paying statutory licensing fees instead of negotiating individual contracts with content owners. This strategic shift was essential for Aereo to continue to offer its service and bypass the issues it faced with copyright infringement claims. However, even with this change in approach, the legal challenges remained, ultimately leading to the Supreme Court ruling against Aero and resulting in the shutdown of its service.

User Penleychan
by
8.2k points