Question

Title:Williams, B. (2004) - Truth and truthfulness

Your paper will need:

1. A title
2. An abstract
3. Argument Reconstruction
4. Final assessment

Keep in mind these characteristics of the paper that you must submit:

Critical

*Explain and assess whether the paper’s main thesis and premises are plausible or implausible, or whether it successfully solves the problem that it is supposed to solve. Say why.
*Explain whether you agree or disagree with the main’s point/theses of the paper. Say why.
*Formulate your own ideas in a constructive dialogue with the paper.
*Relate to other papers, ideas and issues discussed in lectures or other readings.

Analysis

*Summarize the paper’s main thesis and premises.
*Present the problem/topic that the paper addresses.
*Define the key terms discussed in the paper.
*Use examples to clarify the ideas and concepts discussed in the paper.
*Situate the paper’s contribution in the context of the topics discussed in lectures and readings.

Chose one of the readings for the class (the list is in the syllabus) and present, reconstruct, and assess the main idea and argument of that reading.

You can understand each component of your critical analysis in the following way:


Abstract (100–150 words)

*This as the introduction to your paper.
*Situate the paper.
*Say what it is about.
*State what you will do in your text.

Answer 1

The student's assignment involves analyzing and critiquing Bernard Williams' paper 'Truth and Truthfulness' by summarizing the work, presenting an original thesis, and situating the argument in the wider academic dialogue.

Step-by-step explanation:

The student is tasked with reviewing and critiquing a paper by Williams, specifically 'Truth and Truthfulness' (2004). A thorough analysis requires components such as an abstract, introduction, review, and conclusion. A strong analytical paper not only summarizes the original work but also presents an original thesis situated within the context of broader scholarly work. For an analytical and critical paper, it is essential to engage with the material by forming a dialogue that includes agreement or disagreement with the author's points, reflecting on related readings and lectures, and asserting your own thesis statement and supporting arguments. After establishing the Williams paper’s context and summarizing its main points, the paper must critically assess its arguments and contribute original ideas to the scholarly conversation.